MOVIES WORLD BY JAZLAN

[ad_1] ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें अफ्रीका के जिबूती में स्थित चीन के सैन्य बेस पर मौजूद सैनिकों ने एक अमेरिकी विमान पर लेजर हमला कर दिया। इसमें दो अमेरिकी वायुसैनिक घायल हो गए। हालांकि चीन ने इन आरोपों को सिरे से खारिज कर दिया है।  पेंटागन की प्रवक्ता डाना डब्ल्यू वाइट ने कहा कि लेजर हमले में सी-130 विमान में सवार दो वायुसैनिक घायल हुए हैं। उन्हें यकीन है कि इसके पीछे चीन के सैनिक हैं। डान ने यह भी बताया कि दो से ज्यादा और दस से कम बार ऐसी घटनाएं हो चुकी हैं। हाल के हफ्तों में ऐसी घटनाएं बढ़ी हैं।  उन्होंने चीन के समक्ष इसका आधिकारिक विरोध दर्ज कराया है। मीडिया रिपोर्ट में दावा किया गया है कि यह लेजर पायलटों को कुछ समय के लिए अंधा भी कर सकता है। पेंटागन का आरोप है कि यह लेजर सैन्य स्तर का था, जिससे दो अमेरिकी पायलट घायल हो गए।   उधर, चीन के रक्षा और विदेश मंत्रालय ने अलग-अलग बयान जारी करके इन आरोपों को आधारहीन करार देते हुए नकार दिया है। चीन के विदेश मंत्रालय के प्रवक्ता हुआ चुनयिंग ने कहा, अमेरिका में कुछ लोगों को तथ्यों पर ध्यान देना चाहिए। न की ऐसे झूठे आरोप लगाने चाहिए। ज्ञात हो कि 2017 म...

[ad_1] “Anyone with no invasive intention will find no reason to worry about this,” she added. While China has long claimed the islands, reefs and other outcroppings within the South China Sea, other nations also have claims there, including Vietnam and the Philippines. China’s vast reclamation project , which began in earnest in 2013, shortly after Mr. Xi became the country’s paramount leader, has steadily turned once-uninhabited places into fortified islands with airfields and increasingly military outposts. In doing so it has brushed aside warnings from the United States and other nations and even a ruling against its territorial claims by an international arbitration panel in 2016. China’s base in Djibouti, its first overseas, has long been a source of concern for the United States and other militaries operating around the Horn of Africa. It opened last year and has been portrayed by the Chinese as a logistics base to support antipiracy, counterterrorism and humanitarian operatio...

[ad_1] The process that led to the implementation of President Trump’s transgender military ban in March is becoming clearer, thanks to a trove of new documents that shed some light on the otherwise murky closed-door dealings. Four different lawsuits are currently challenging the ban, which was issued on March 23. A ThinkProgress review of several documents included in discovery finds a massive disconnect between what was discussed in the meetings and what was ultimately recommended, reinforcing concerns that the process was rigged from the beginning, in favor of a ban. The documents  offer a limited glimpse into the military panel that convened between October and January to study the potential consequences of such a ban, but they do nothing to help justify it. They include agendas from all 13 panel meetings, minutes from the first five of those meetings, and some other supplementary documents that guided the discussion. Many of the details from the documents are redacted to bl...

[ad_1] The process that led to the implementation of President Trump’s transgender military ban in March is becoming clearer, thanks to a trove of new documents that shed some light on the otherwise murky closed-door dealings. Four different lawsuits are currently challenging the ban, which was issued on March 23. A ThinkProgress review of several documents included in discovery finds a massive disconnect between what was discussed in the meetings and what was ultimately recommended, reinforcing concerns that the process was rigged from the beginning, in favor of a ban. The documents  offer a limited glimpse into the military panel that convened between October and January to study the potential consequences of such a ban, but they do nothing to help justify it. They include agendas from all 13 panel meetings, minutes from the first five of those meetings, and some other supplementary documents that guided the discussion. Many of the details from the documents are redacted to bl...