MOVIES WORLD BY JAZLAN

[ad_1] ख़बर सुनें ख़बर सुनें अफ्रीका के जिबूती में स्थित चीन के सैन्य बेस पर मौजूद सैनिकों ने एक अमेरिकी विमान पर लेजर हमला कर दिया। इसमें दो अमेरिकी वायुसैनिक घायल हो गए। हालांकि चीन ने इन आरोपों को सिरे से खारिज कर दिया है।  पेंटागन की प्रवक्ता डाना डब्ल्यू वाइट ने कहा कि लेजर हमले में सी-130 विमान में सवार दो वायुसैनिक घायल हुए हैं। उन्हें यकीन है कि इसके पीछे चीन के सैनिक हैं। डान ने यह भी बताया कि दो से ज्यादा और दस से कम बार ऐसी घटनाएं हो चुकी हैं। हाल के हफ्तों में ऐसी घटनाएं बढ़ी हैं।  उन्होंने चीन के समक्ष इसका आधिकारिक विरोध दर्ज कराया है। मीडिया रिपोर्ट में दावा किया गया है कि यह लेजर पायलटों को कुछ समय के लिए अंधा भी कर सकता है। पेंटागन का आरोप है कि यह लेजर सैन्य स्तर का था, जिससे दो अमेरिकी पायलट घायल हो गए।   उधर, चीन के रक्षा और विदेश मंत्रालय ने अलग-अलग बयान जारी करके इन आरोपों को आधारहीन करार देते हुए नकार दिया है। चीन के विदेश मंत्रालय के प्रवक्ता हुआ चुनयिंग ने कहा, अमेरिका में कुछ लोगों को तथ्यों पर ध्यान देना चाहिए। न की ऐसे झूठे आरोप लगाने चाहिए। ज्ञात हो कि 2017 म...

[ad_1] Fact Check of the Day That’s false. Two were detained after President Trump took office. President Trump in the Oval Office on Tuesday. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times As everybody is aware, the past Administration has long been asking for three hostages to be released from a North Korean Labor camp, but to no avail. Stay tuned! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 3, 2018 Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, suggested on Thursday afternoon that Mr. Trump was including Otto Warmbier among the three hostages the president had referred to in his Twitter post. Mr. Warmbier, an American college student, was detained in North Korea in January 2016. He was flown back to the United States last June in a vegetative state and died at a hospital in Ohio shortly after. Ms. Sanders also said she “couldn’t confirm the validity” of reports about the hostages’ release. She was referring to a Thursday morning interview during which Rudolph W. Giuliani — who recentl...

[ad_1] The process that led to the implementation of President Trump’s transgender military ban in March is becoming clearer, thanks to a trove of new documents that shed some light on the otherwise murky closed-door dealings. Four different lawsuits are currently challenging the ban, which was issued on March 23. A ThinkProgress review of several documents included in discovery finds a massive disconnect between what was discussed in the meetings and what was ultimately recommended, reinforcing concerns that the process was rigged from the beginning, in favor of a ban. The documents  offer a limited glimpse into the military panel that convened between October and January to study the potential consequences of such a ban, but they do nothing to help justify it. They include agendas from all 13 panel meetings, minutes from the first five of those meetings, and some other supplementary documents that guided the discussion. Many of the details from the documents are redacted to bl...